Awaken* newsletter

September 12, 2024

SHARE:

In the half-year I’ve been writing this newsletter I have only interviewed established founders. This article is my first deviation from the pattern and I couldn’t have asked for a better guest. Emily Luk–though a first-time founder–is not new to startups, having joined Stripe as a founding member of their growth team back when the company was around ~150 employees.

Now, she is building Plenty, an investment platform for modern couples. Talking to Emily has convinced me of two things, first–that this is a very large and important problem, second–that Emily is probably the right person to build it. I’m excited to share my conversation with her.

TLDR; Key Takeaways

If you only have a few moments, here are a few golden nuggets from my conversation with Emily:

  • An exercise to find your calling: Write down everything that makes you happy, ~100 words. Keep cutting the list in half until you have five words. What’s the grounding/theme that goes through all five? That’s a good starting point to find your calling.
  • Address opportunity costs before starting a company: Running a successful startup is a long journey, the average time to IPO is 7-10 years. If possible, do the things you’d regret missing out on before embarking on your journey.
  • Aspiring founders should focus on developing taste: As a founder, you don’t need to do everything personally yourself, but you need to know what great looks like. Working alongside great talent can help you develop this intuition.
  • Being relatable is a core part of business: People are much more likely to do business with you if they can relate to you. Put in some effort to learn about common interests of the type of people you want to do business with.
  • We are in the middle of a generational shift: 33% of millennials got married or entered a long-term partnership in the past five years. This is the first generation where dual-income families are normal.
  • Financial products for couples need an update: Many financial products used today were built for single-income households and aren’t adapted for dual-income families.

Tell me about your journey, how did you end up in the Bay Area/tech?

It goes pretty far back. My grandfather started two companies. One he ran for 20 years, and the other for 25 years. Then my parents emigrated to Canada, started this company, and ran it for 18 years. Growing up, I thought most people started companies. It wasn’t until my grade seven careers class, where they walked you through all the different careers and had a chart about the percentage of people in each career, that I realized entrepreneurs are less than 10% of the population. I thought it was a much higher percentage because everyone around my parents was an entrepreneur. I have always been interested in starting businesses. I was that stereotypical kid who kept running side hustles.

I read that your first entrepreneurial endeavor was a fundraiser for UNICEF.

Yeah, it was grade one, and the teacher decided to have a competition to raise money for UNICEF. The idea was to go trick-or-treating using those orange UNICEF boxes to collect donations. I lived in Edmonton at the time, which is the most populated city that far north, so winter was basically already here by Halloween. We had this competition in class to see how much money people could raise, but my parents were really worried my brother and I would get sick if we went trick-or-treating outside when there was already a foot of snow on the ground. I really wanted to make sure I wasn’t going to lose in the UNICEF competition, so instead, I decided to take a bunch of origami, fold it into different shapes like planes and boats, and sell it during recess to the teachers. All the money went to UNICEF. This was my way of being like, “Okay, great, I can do this all the time during recess for a month,” and then raise enough money instead of going trick-or-treating as a workaround for that.

Let’s go back to your story.

I’d already started my own company in high school and had been really involved with startups in university, running a student-run venture fund that organized pitch nights. Because of these experiences, I had the chance to work at the largest VC fund in Canada when I graduated.  It was an incredible experience because we got to see a large breadth of startups during that vintage. Some of the companies I personally worked on included Sonder in their pre-seed stage and Hopper in the earlier days. About two years into my time in a venture, my younger brother told me he was thinking of moving to the Bay Area when he graduated from Waterloo. We’re very close, and I wanted to be in the same city as him. Around the same time, I was thinking about applying for jobs. My brother wasn’t going to graduate yet, but I figured I would start looking for a job there. And so I started applying for some jobs and just started talking to more people and getting more involved in the Bay Area. 

Right around the same time, Stripe ended up reaching out to me. I had met members of their team, and this was back when the company was like 150 people. The company was much smaller; they had just hired a COO and were just starting to build up their business and growth teams. We chatted about whether I would be interested in joining the stuff they were doing on the growth side. Around the same time, I had gotten connected to Gold House founder Bing Chen. I went to Bing for career advice because I had a couple of other opportunities that were also in the Bay which I was considering. I was 22 years old, trying to figure out what to do with these opportunities in front of me. On top of that, I was potentially moving to another country on the other side of the continent. I don’t even know if Bing will remember this, but it left such a mark on me. He walked me through an exercise he did when he was in university. It was something he found really helpful to understand your own values and what brings you joy. 

The exercise he walked me through was to start with an empty piece of paper and write down, in free form, everything that makes you happy. Anything that brings you joy—it can be an item, an exercise, or an activity. I jotted down like 100 different words. Then he said, “Now start to cut it down. Cut it in half. Take the ones that don’t matter. Now you have 50. Now cut it down to 25.” This is when it starts to get really hard. “Now cut it down to 10. Now cut it down to 5.” With the last five words, is there a grounding or a theme that goes through all of it? If those are the things that really bring you joy after you’ve processed this and wondered, that’s probably a very good starting point to think about what you dedicate your time to.

So what were your last five words?

For me, I remember really thinking about how I loved making and empowering. That was one of the words that came out. It was empowering, teaching. I really believed in it. At the time, I had done my CPA and CFA when I was in venture, and I really understood and saw how in the world of finance, things were so opaque. I had also thought a lot about family and friends, and I started thinking about how those words could formulate into almost like my North Star. Big credit to Bing; after I went through that exercise, the answer was very obvious to me. What was so exciting about joining Stripe back in 2015 was that we were really focused on helping SMBs and startups in this opaque world of finance. At the time, payment companies were used to dealing with massive enterprises, so if you were a startup or an SMB, you basically didn’t matter. The products were terrible, it was hard to integrate, and the process of using the product was terrible. For many entrepreneurs, being able to accept money for your product or service is a critical part of running your business. If you don’t have revenue, nothing else works.

For me, it was so obvious that of all the opportunities I had been looking at, Stripe was clearly the best one. Ironically, now in hindsight, I can say this: the other thing that was really crazy was when I decided to join Stripe, I didn’t know my title. I actually forgot to ask what my title was until I received the offer letter. I didn’t even bother asking. I knew what I was going to work on, and I knew who I was going to work with. It was also by far the lowest salary package compared to all the other companies. Given how much Stripe has grown, it’s definitely turned into the best decision. At the time when I joined, it was so clear that it aligned with the things I cared about most. The other things like compensation or title just didn’t matter as much.

You took a sabbatical from work before starting Plenty in 2022. What inspired the sabbatical?

When my parents started their business, they ran it for 18 years. My grandparents ran their businesses for almost 20-25 years. So, I never thought of starting a company as a quick two to three-year journey. I thought it would be a very long journey, and I wanted to feel like I was ready to commit that kind of time and have that kind of endurance. That was one part that was really important. Travel is very important to me–being able to see the world. I knew that if I didn’t have this period of travel, I would always wonder if I missed out.

Part of how I thought about the mental preparation to become a founder is being able to think about how it might feel. One of the parts that helps with the mental endurance of it is being able to realize what might make it harder and, if possible, try to solve some of that earlier. The sabbatical year was basically that. If I didn’t have it, I would look back at the very hard moments when you need to keep going when you’re starting a company and think, “Oh man, maybe I should just stop. Maybe now I can have my travel year because I never had it. Was it worth the sacrifice?” I think it just makes it so much harder instead of getting ahead of it.

What made you feel that it was the right time to start your founder journey? 

I think of myself as a lifelong learner. When I experience anything in life, I immediately start to think about what I can learn, what I can do differently, what I would do in the future, and what might have changed the outcome. That is deeply ingrained in who I am. I realized I would probably always feel like there was more to learn and never feel ready.

My mother had a philosophy when she was running her company: you don’t need to do everything personally yourself, but you need to know what great looks like. You need to have enough exposure to know what great products, sales, and marketing look like and have that intuition. You don’t have to do every single thing personally, and frankly, you can’t. There was a point at which I realized I had been exposed to enough people who did their jobs great and did really great work. That shift in mindset was really valuable. I thought, “I might not ever feel ready, and that’s okay, but I’ve also had some experience, so maybe it is time to take a bet on myself.”

For young people who aspire to start their own business in the future, would you say that the function of what they are doing is secondary to who they are around?

Here’s how I approached it when I was at Stripe. I was really lucky because Stripe had an incredibly high talent bar. I was surrounded by so many people. I was also the youngest person on the business team, so I was surrounded by all these people who were 5, 10, 15 years ahead of me career-wise. They were at the top of their game at what they did, and I just tried to be as much of a sponge as possible. I also moved teams a couple of times, which helped with getting exposure to a lot of parts of the organization.

One of the things I’m most grateful for is that Stripe used to have this policy where every email that is sent across teams or externally, is copied to an email list so anyone in the company can read it. It’s complete email transparency. They don’t do this anymore, but for the entirety of the time that I was there, that’s what they did. Also, every single team had to send meeting notes at the end of every meeting to these email lists, and anyone in the company could read the meeting notes. Every one or two months, I would really focus on understanding what another team did. For example, when I was on the sales team, I’d really focus on what the partnership team did and read every single one of their meeting notes for two months. Then I would rotate to another team. I spent a month thinking about risk and compliance, a month reading everything in the world related to the legal side of things, and then I would rotate to what product is doing, what engineering is doing, and how infrastructure works.

It felt like I created my own mini-MBA because I got to see not just the theory but how all functions actually work in a company. I took being a sponge really seriously. It was honestly so fun for me. I know it was rare to have access to all of this knowledge, to have that quality of thought and quality of people around me that I could easily learn from.

Could that be replicated at larger companies?

It’s really only startups where you can get that level of access. Another thing that benefited my learning was that Stripe was growing rapidly while I was there. It grew from a couple hundred to a couple thousand people during my time there. Because it was growing so quickly, I saw many chapters of a startup during that time. There was such an emphasis on communication. Because the company was growing so quickly, documentation was especially critical so that work was not duplicated. That, I think, is one of the unique growth opportunities of being in a startup that is harder to get access to when you’re at a big company.

Given that you come from a family of entrepreneurs, do you find yourself asking your parents and grandparents for business advice?

I definitely talk to them about work a lot more after starting my company. Before I started Plenty, when I talked to them about work, it was sometimes a little frustrating because they’d say, “Why don’t you just ask for the promotion?” I’d be like, “Mom, it doesn’t work like that. You have to earn it and wait your time.” My mom, being an ultra-entrepreneur, thinks it’s exclusively merit-based. In reality, in a big organization, there are performance cycles, and you have to wait six months. You can’t just suddenly say, “I want to be promoted today,” and have a multi-hundred or multi-thousand-person organization just say yes. It doesn’t work like that. 

At that time, it was much harder to ask for career advice. But now, it’s really helpful because my parents deeply understand. It’s not even the practical business advice, frankly; it’s the emotional journey. It’s so hard to hire, support someone to perform, deal with a supplier not living up to expectations, or have a backup plan in case things don’t work out. These are all fairly generalizable pieces of advice that have been incredibly helpful. More than anything, starting a company is an extremely lonely experience. It’s been incredible to talk to my parents, not about the specifics like our cost per click, but about the emotional aspects. It’s hard to feel the pressure of needing to have all the answers and supporting your team’s families. They instinctively understand it on an emotional level, which doesn’t need to be explained.

What is the core problem that inspired you to start Plenty?

If you look at the two generations that are going to undergo the largest amounts of change in the next decade, it’s the baby boomers (who we are not optimistic about being able to sell software to), and then the millennial generation. The reality is that millennials are now turning 30, and this chapter from 30 to 40 years old is generally when you find a partner, buy a house, have kids, and get promoted. There’s so much change that happens. If you navigate your finances well during this chapter, you can set yourself up for the rest of your life.

We saw that it’s also the chapter where people want to take their finances more seriously. They’re actively looking for things to do, but if you’re building up to your first million dollars, there aren’t great products or services meant for that. Once you get over a million dollars, there are lots of financial advisors who are really good and can help you, but why would the best financial advisors want to work with clients with less capital? What we saw was that this industry doesn’t have the best people working with the people who arguably need the most help.

The other aspect of Plenty came from personal experience. When Channing and I got engaged, we couldn’t find any products that made it easy for us to manage our money together. We believe very deeply that the best decisions we make as a partnership are the ones we make together, and that financial decisions are very important in unlocking optionality down the road. If there aren’t great products that make it easy for you to work together, then you’re probably going to have a much harder time trying to figure out things in the future too, right? Those two things were the core motivations for starting Plenty.

Why do you think there is a gap in products to help couples manage their finances in tandem?

Nowadays, it’s normal to be dual-income because both people are educated and everything costs more. It’s more fulfilling to feel like you both have careers and jobs, and it might be necessary in order to support a family. At this point, about 80% of this generation are dual-income families and couples. 

This used to not be the case. In the two generations before us, the majority of people were single-income families. A lot of the financial products we use today were designed by people who were single-income household members of other single-income households. So it completely makes sense why they designed a lot of joint products the way they did because it used to make sense, but it doesn’t make sense anymore. 

One example of this is if you look at American Express or Chase, there is no concept of a joint credit card. You are both legally on the hook for paying the bill, but both of you don’t get to see what you’ve spent. That doesn’t make sense. So if you get a credit card with Chase and add your partner to it, your partner doesn’t even get a login. They can’t see anything, even though they have a credit card with their name on it. American Express is quirky in a different way. We have both of these cards and from personal experience, when you add your partner to an American Express card, they can only see what they spent on their card. They cannot see what you’ve spent on the main card, even though you both share the card. 

There are all these little bumps related to access or permission, but it dates back to a time when it was very normal for one person to earn an income, but it’s not very normal anymore. People and couples nowadays expect to have fairly equal access to understanding their money together. It’s not the same as, “Oh, if they know everything, that’s fine. I don’t need to know anything.” That’s just not nearly as common anymore. Nowadays, conversations around family finances are happening with both people being more equal than ever before. 

What we also noticed is that because people are getting married later than ever, they are already used to having their own financial accounts. Even after getting married, maybe they open up some things that they share. But it’s a journey towards sharing more of their finances. They still have things under each of our names. A lot of the financial system was built around the reality of the single-income family that had everything fully joined. But that’s just not the case anymore. That has changed especially quickly in the last five years. Five years ago 33% of this generation was married, and now almost 60-70% of this generation is married or in a long-term partnership.

How do you think being Asian has impacted your founder’s journey? 

For better or worse, I have been on the other end of bias, but not because I’m Asian. At least, I think not because I’m Asian. But for other reasons, like being part of a husband and wife team. I’ve even had a VC comment about how he would never report to his wife. I don’t think anyone has ever explicitly called out the fact that I was Asian, but it is something that I am aware of. And here’s the reason why. I feel like I have to work extra hard to be relatable, and frankly, there are assumptions that people have.

My husband is from Virginia and his family’s been in the US for a while. Lots of people are surprised when I mention that I’m the sports person in the relationship. I watch basketball, I watch football, I know the players, and he doesn’t watch any of it. Even when we’re in conversations with potential investors, they’re surprised by that. I don’t know why that might be the case, but I joke about it. I say, you probably wouldn’t have expected a short little Canadian Asian female to know this much about football, right? 

I do think what you like to talk about is important. When it comes to attracting business partners, of course, the way you think about business and strategy makes people want to work with you. But there’s another aspect to it. If someone feels like you have something in common with them, they think that you can be a friend. Whether or not they want to spend more time with you is actually really impactful for whether or not they want to back you.

I think I’ve always been aware that I have to work extra hard to be relatable, but I don’t try to spend too much time thinking about it beyond thinking of ways that I can support other Asian founders, because it’s not something I can change. Frankly, I just focus on what needs to be done. I’ve always enjoyed football, but I’ve definitely put in the effort to stay aware of what’s going on because I know it is something that is unexpected when I talk about it.

I’ve talked to a few female CEOs whose husbands are also part of the company. Can you comment on what that’s like?

I think it might be happening more frequently as we go along. I mean, it makes a lot of sense, right? There is no one else in your life that you respect, admire, and trust to that degree. Building a startup is not an easy or linear path. In those moments where you’re like, “Oh gosh, what should we do?” not needing to doubt if you’re building with the right person or if you can trust that person is actually so important. It helps stabilize you through the hard moments because you know they’re in it with you, you can trust them completely, and they care about you. That psychological trust is crucial.

–

Plenty is hiring! If you are interested in working with Emily to build financial tools for the modern couple, check out the available job listings here!

Emily has also graciously offered a 3-month free promo code for our readers. If you are interested in trying out Plenty, use code AHNCommunity to get 3 months free. Thank you Emily for joining us!

Related Articles

Jenny Woo_by Laura Brad Photo (1)-jpg

Stories

How Jenny Woo Builds Deeper Connections With A Card Deck Up Her Sleeve

Social media undoubtedly has brought our society many wonders. The connection it can bring and the impact it can make are undeniable. But along with the rise of platforms that prioritize online personas and shortcut conversations, profound connections feel like an endurance test.

Jenny Woo, taking an emotional and deep-dive reading of this pattern, decided to develop the 52 Essential Conversations. She then established Mind Brain Emotion with the hope of helping people stay in tune with their emotions, building happiness, serenity, and wisdom. 

AN INCUBATION AT HARVARD

It was an insightful experience to have this exclusive interview with Jenny Woo, whose keen observation and curiosity have led her to the creation of Mind Brain Emotion, educational card games, and mental health tools to help people build essential human skills and connections.

Delightfully quipping “I earned enough credentials so that my parents and grandparents could each have an honorary degree,” Jenny showcased a strong personality, one that is “resourceful, resilient, and hard-working.” As she would humorously refer to herself as a “knowledge smuggler,” Jenny dug up the problems in current education towards one’s emotional development:

During my study and research at Harvard, I was drawn to the intersection of emotional intelligence and cultural identity. Self-awareness, social awareness, and relationship skills were three key components of emotional intelligence. As a management consultant, executive coach, and HR leader, I had already observed how essential these skills were for career success. 

And yet, the education system did little to expose students to these skills. Teaching resources were scarce, expensive, and outdated, and only the most expensive private schools had access. I also interviewed Harvard and MIT students on what got them to be where they are today and realized that a large component was having access to essential conversations and connections with mentors and parents. 

Jenny also detailed the inspiration behind her first deck, 52 Essential Conversations, which came from careful investigation into neuroscience and social affairs:

My findings are also aligned with neuroscience research from Harvard/MIT on the power of conversations. For the average Joe or Jenny, like me, we had limited access to social capital and resources like this. So, it inspired me to translate emotional intelligence research and social capital into affordable and relatable card games to help everyone reach their potential. In my research, I also saw a lack of representation and conversations around diversity, equity, and inclusion in the emotional intelligence learning framework. For example, how could we practice self-awareness or social awareness if we didn’t discuss the role of race? Being socially aware is also understanding our privilege and past.

NAVIGATION THROUGH RACISM AND MISOGYNY 

Jenny’s journey was never met with only the appraisals but also the scathing criticism of her success as an Asian American. Her detractors claimed many misogynistic things upon her (“women like this die alone”) and called her a CCP spy, because it was never expected of a woman like her to achieve such success. However, it is the meaning of her work and the applauding reaction of her supporters that have kept her moving forward: 

User testimonials are why I do what I do. My card decks are being used in ways that I had never imagined – in veteran hospitals and curriculums, in Federally-funded programs that support homeless youth and displaced families, in trauma-informed social work to help neglected and abused kids and adults, for Ukraine teen refugees, in speech-language therapy to help clients build reading comprehension, in community college and adult learning ESL classes to help immigrants learn language and networking, in gifted and talented programs to help students build both critical thinking and empathy, in workplaces for teambuilding and mentorship, etc. I’ve done university research on the utility of the card decks and it’s amazing to see it benefiting people from all socioeconomic classes, from poverty to affluence. 

At the end of a school district workshop I delivered, the school counselor told me that the divorced parents who had been on toxic non-speaking terms were surprisingly communicating warmly to each other and their child by the end of my hands-on workshop using the card decks. It’s anecdotes like this that keep me going.

AI, GEN Z, AND MIND BRAIN EMOTION

When asked about how AI has transcended society, she brought up the concerns for mental health, fearing the permeating scarcity of personal connection:

I was interviewed on an emerging study on the impact of AI on the mental health of workers (not just in the US, but also in the Asia Pacific) between the ages of 25 – 55. It found that workers were lonelier and craved more social interaction. I love tech and AI, and I believe they have improved the quality of our lives tremendously. However, in the context of emotional intelligence, it’s making it harder for people to experience authentic and unfiltered IRL emotional connections and social interactions. Lately, I’ve been interviewed a lot on emotional intelligence topics like how to initiate a conversation with strangers, phubbing, and how to cope with social anxiety and ghosting. Although people are now much more aware of the importance of mental health, I’m afraid that many are left with little practice (or willingness) for human-to-human connection. 

However, there’s always a silver lining. With the growing acceptance to talk about mental health among younger generations, Jenny sees a glimmer of hope in her products. They have the potential to support young people in fostering greater openness and understanding surrounding mental health issues:

I have a few more decks in the works that support Gen Alpha, GenZers, and Millennials. My card deck topics were created based on user feedback on their needs. For example, I created the 52 Essential Coping Skills during the pandemic to support my college students’ mental health. Many of the cards stemmed from a course I had been teaching, where I created practical Zoom games and assignments to help my students cope with the situations they were confiding in me. My class was oversubscribed with a long waitlist, so I made my exercises into this card game to offer instant support.

I created the 52 Essential Critical Thinking Skills in response to Black Lives Matter and Asian Hate crimes to give younger generations the tools for activism and advocacy. Most recently, a national youth-centered activism nonprofit organization contacted me to discuss collaborative partnerships to support our younger generations. We want to provide concrete tools to help our youth go from civic-conscious to civic-committed while managing the mental health toll of the geopolitical issues. Lastly, reaching younger generations through social media and YouTube would be great. I would love to collaborate with influencers who care deeply about mental health!

Speaking about her vision for Mind Brain Emotion, she expressed her desire to expand Mind Brain Emotion globally, especially in APAC:

I’d love to connect with publishers and distributors to bring evidence-based emotional intelligence resources into those countries. I believe these resources will benefit both the younger and older generations.

CONNECT WITH JENNY WOO / MIND BRAIN EMOTION

Website: http://mindbrainemotion.com

Socials: 

Neal Jean

Awaken* newsletter

Behind the Scenes: A Conversation With Neal Jean About the Birth of Beacons.ai

If you want to see what the next generation of Asian leaders looks like–look no further than Beacons.ai co-founder and CEO, Neal Jean. Backed by Y Combinator, a16z, and even our former guest Bryant Chou, Beacons is an up-and-coming Operating System for creators. A one-stop shop for creators to do email marketing, make their online store, their link in bio, etc. Despite still being early in his entrepreneurial journey, Neal has already accumulated an incredible amount of insights and experiences, and I hope you enjoy learning about them as much as I did. Without further ado:

BEFORE STARTUPS

Neal’s background before startups is quite unorthodox. A few years after graduating from Duke undergrad, he went back to college and got a second bachelor’s degree, then went on to get a PhD from Stanford. I asked Neal to connect the dots for me:

I grew up in Ohio and when I was 18, I didn’t really know what I wanted to do with my life. I wasn’t ready to make big decisions like that. I wasn’t aware of many different career paths. When I got to Duke, I didn’t really know what I wanted to do. I ended up studying economics and math there. I started my career as an options trader working in finance. I fell into that because I was studying economics and was somewhat good at math. It became clear to me very quickly that I didn’t want to do that my whole life. Around 2010 or 2011, I was living in Chicago working in trading and I’d be sitting at my trading desk reading essays by Paul Graham about startups. At the time, I thought it would be cool to build a company and make a difference, but I wasn’t confident that I could do it myself. I wasn’t technical and I wasn’t very familiar with it. Now I know that it doesn’t really matter if you’re technical, you learn everything by doing it anyway.

I mentioned that as a non-technical person, being unconfident in my ability to start a startup resonated with me.

Definitely. I majored in economics, so maybe you can relate to some of this [I also majored in economics]. One of the only things I remembered from my economics classes at Duke was this idea that advances in technology are the only thing that really moves the world forward over long periods of time. I think that idea really stuck with me. It was one thing that drew me to tech. I started my career in finance. I actually got fired from that first job. I made a bad trade, lost a decent amount of money, and got fired the next day. Looking back, I feel really lucky because it gave me a chance to reset and be more intentional about what I wanted to do with my life. 

So my younger brother, Joel, was Stanford class of 2011. He then went to MIT and did a PhD there, researching solar cells. It just felt like the stuff he was working on, he was trying to save the world since he was working on climate change you know. He was working on developing new types of solar materials. It just felt very meaningful compared to what I was doing. He actually now has a solar startup called Swift Solar. So I decided to go back to school, went to Georgia Tech for two years, did a second bachelor’s in EE, and I thought I also wanted to work in solar, but the summer before I went to Stanford, I took Andrew Ng’s machine learning class on Coursera and found it really interesting. I did a rotation in a machine learning group at Stanford and decided to switch to CS basically. My PhD was mostly on using computer vision and satellite imagery to map out poverty in Africa, which was the kind of meaningful project I wanted to work on coming out of finance. But even coming into Stanford, I had the idea that I wanted to build something eventually. Near the end of my PhD, I started working with a couple of friends on some projects. That led to applying to YC, pivoting a couple of times, and eventually getting to what we’re working on at Beacons today. 

PIVOTING IDEAS

Most startups have co-founders. I asked Neal how he met his and if he had any advice for other people looking for co-founders:

I have three co-founders. Two of them were in my PhD program. We met when we were visiting Stanford, deciding what grad school to go to. I met our fourth co-founder at Georgia Tech when I was doing my second undergrad there, so I’ve known him for over 10 years. I think I got lucky and ended up being able to work with my friends. If you get lucky and you have friends who have similar interests and you work well together, that can be a great path. One of the things that surprised me about startups is that it’s very random. Before you do a startup, you read about startups in TechCrunch and you think they all follow a standard path. It’s like you raise a pre-seed, you raise a seed round, you raise a series A and then whatever. But people do all kinds of crazy things, and the same goes for finding a co-founder. There are lots of ways to do it. If you don’t have friends to do it with, one thing I would suggest is to develop your own interests. Follow things that you’re interested in and try to go deep in those areas. You’ll naturally start doing more interesting things and meet more people. If you’re doing that intentionally, I think you’ll create a lot of luck surface area for yourself.

Earlier in the interview, Neal mentioned that his team pivoted a few times, so I asked him what the original idea for Beacons was:

I used to live in Rains [graduate apartments at Stanford], and the first project that we built was a face recognition smart lock for my apartment. We tried to get it to recognize all of our friends’ faces and unlock my apartment when they showed up. It worked sometimes. We made a portable version of it to bring to our YC interview. That’s what we got into YC with.

We quickly pivoted away from our original idea after our YC interview. We realized that all of our backgrounds were in software, and to build the kind of company we initially envisioned would require more of a consumer hardware focus. So, we started exploring new ideas and different things. We entered YC without a clear idea and spent the first month building productivity software, which I think is a common trap for founders who don’t have any better ideas.  

About a month into YC, I attended a friend’s wedding in Singapore and met a woman who was running an e-commerce company and doing all of her marketing through influencers on Instagram. She heard about my background in machine learning and asked if I could build a system to help her find influencers to work with. She showed me spreadsheets where she was tracking people’s follower counts and the number of likes and comments they were getting on their posts. She would then compute their engagement ratios and try to figure out how much she would be willing to pay them. It seemed like a good problem to automate and potentially improve with machine learning. I returned to SF, discussed it with my co-founders, and we invited her to come from Singapore to SF so we could start building this system for her. She actually came over the next Monday and moved into our apartment. I gave up my bed for her and moved into my co-founder’s bed. We spent the rest of YC building with her, and that was how we got into the creator space. Eventually, we realized that we were more excited to build products for the creator side of the market than the brand side.

We first started building something that’s similar to Cameo. We were trying to build a Cameo for creators. However, we soon realized that Cameo was already doing a good job at catering to creators. But that’s how we started talking to lots of creators. We saw Linktree taking off around that time. Their product looked pretty basic and we weren’t that good at building software at the time. So we thought we could probably compete with them. That’s how we started down the path we’ve been on for the last couple of years.

GETTING CUSTOMERS

I’m always curious how startups get their first customers, and I was especially curious about Beacons since they sell to influencers. Here’s what Neal had to say:

It is harder today because I think there are more people trying to reach out and get in touch with these creators. We just used cold email in the beginning, this was when we were still building the Cameo for creators. 

We put together a list of 50 creators who were based in the Bay Area and I emailed all of them. The email was basically like, “Hey, whatever your name is, your biggest fan, Jesse, who is my co-founder, wants to pay you $20 for this video. So you have $20 waiting for you. Just reply to my email and we’ll tell you how you can get this money.” We thought it could work. We got one reply out of the 50. Her name is Suki. Her Instagram is @sukiluser, if you want to look her up. She had just moved to the Bay Area from Toronto. She didn’t have many friends yet. She asked if Jesse was my co-founder. I confirmed, she was really nice about it. We met up the next day in Hayes Valley. She was our first user. She’s an advisor to the company today and still a friend. 

Although I thought this idea was genius, it sounded like it wasn’t too effective, so I asked Neal if he switched up his tactics to get customers 2-10:

No, we kept doing the cold email. After we pivoted to the link in bio, we started a new cold email strategy. We would find creators who are using Linktree. Then, we would rebuild their website in Beacons. We would send them a screenshot of the website we built for them that was nicer than their existing Linktree website and then ask them to sign up. That’s how we got our first couple hundred users. 

PHD FOUNDERS

Because I know some folks who have or are pursuing a PhD and are looking to get into startups afterwards, I figured I’d ask Neal to reflect on the advantages and disadvantages of being a founder with a PhD:

I think we have more challenges than strengths. One challenge was that we didn’t have any experience working. My other co-founders had never worked before. I had only worked in finance. So I had never worked in tech. I had no idea how tech companies actually operate. So we just had to learn a lot of things from scratch and probably made a lot of rookie mistakes along the way. We also weren’t native to our space. None of us were content creators. And I think early on, there were some challenges that came with that. One, we didn’t have the most empathy for our users. So we were trying to build for them, but we didn’t really know what it was like. We’ve worked on that and improved over time. However, we probably made some decisions and mistakes that others wouldn’t have. From investors, there was a perception that we were mercenaries. We were machine learning PhDs, but we were building things for TikTok creators. They wondered if we were just capitalizing on a hot space. In terms of advantages: now that AI is so popular, I think our backgrounds are going to be more helpful. That’s maybe a more obvious one. A less obvious one that I think has been important is that we’re not necessarily smarter than people who don’t have PhDs. But one thing you do learn during your PhD is not to be intimidated by problems that you don’t know the answer to initially. As a founder, you often don’t know how to do anything going into it. You’re constantly figuring out new things. When you do a PhD, one of the challenges is that you have to bring new knowledge into the world. You’re always trying to figure out things that haven’t been figured out before. You’re not sure if you can figure it out, or at least not sure if you can figure it out in this way. So there’s a certain amount of intellectual resilience or courage that you develop. I think that’s actually been pretty helpful for building a company. To clarify, resilience or intellectual courage isn’t exclusive to PhDs, but it was helpful that we had developed that over time.

Naturally, I had to ask Neal how they managed to convince investors to bet on them:

It depends on the investor. Different investors care about different things and respond to different things. We’ve always been honest about who we are and who we’re not. We didn’t misrepresent ourselves as creator experts. We’ve always been earnest and curious, and over time, dedicated to solving problems in this space. For investors who cared more about that than domain expertise, our approach resonated with them. It’s probably a good thing because if you get money from an investor that doesn’t really match with you, it’s likely to cause problems later on.

BEING NON-TECHNICAL

Backtracking, I asked Neal to expand on an earlier point he made about how non-technical people can dive into a startup and pick things up along the way:

It was definitely beneficial for our team to have experience in software. But none of us had built any consumer software before; we were all research people. We knew Python, but we didn’t know JavaScript. I had imagined that to work and contribute to an early-stage startup, you have to be able to code things up yourself and build products yourself. It depends on the type of company you’re building. If you’re building a dev tools startup, maybe that’s more accurate. But there are many companies where it’s very helpful to have a non-technical person who’s willing to do a lot of different things to make the company work. At Beacons, I’ve done very little coding in the five years that we’ve been working together. Even though I have a PhD in CS, most of the work I’ve done at Beacons to help the company is not writing code. 

We’re a product-led company. Our go-to-market motion is mostly people using the product, and then other people seeing them use the product and adopting it for themselves. We haven’t done a lot of sales or even a lot of marketing up to this point. My role was mostly leading product, especially early on. Now we have other people on the product team. But early on, I was the main product person. Doing product is really about understanding your users or customers and then understanding their problems and then trying to figure out how you can solve them. Because we’re building a software product, it was about understanding how to solve them with software for the most part. The hard part is really understanding the problem and being creative in thinking about how you can provide a solution. That cycle of understanding the problem and then figuring out how to solve it actually creates a lot of leverage within the company.

One thing I took away from previous interviews is that you can’t just go and add all the features that your users ask you to. Users will ask you for this and that, but maybe you’ll end up with a really hodgepodge product if you do that. I wanted to get Neal’s thoughts on how to cut through the noise and identify what it is users actually need:

You do your best. If you look at our product, we definitely added a bunch of features that people asked for that didn’t end up being very useful. I definitely can’t claim that we’ve always done a good job of this. Understanding the problem is not a simple thing, there are lots of different problems and ways to think about them. It’s about fitting them together into one cohesive model of who the customer is and which problems are important enough to solve. It’s also about understanding which problems your company is well-positioned to solve or where you have a right to win as a company. It’s a high dimensional thing that requires a complex model of how the world works, how your customer fits into that world, how you fit into that world, and where you think things are going in the future. Then, it’s about trying to align all those things and build for that future while being constrained on the money, time, and people that you have to deliver that stuff. 

I asked Neal if he wrote out his models explicitly:

Yes, I really like to whiteboard stuff out. We have whiteboards in our office. That was a skill I picked up during my PhD. I also do a lot of writing internally. I believe that writing is thinking. There’s this quote, “Writing is nature’s way of showing you how sloppy your thinking is.” I believe that. 

BEING AN ASIAN FOUNDER

As per newsletter tradition, I asked Neal how being Asian has qualified his experience as a founder:

It’s definitely something I’ve thought about, but I wouldn’t say I spend a ton of time thinking about it. I think I’m relatively lucky in a lot of ways. As a founder, I’m a man, and women often have it harder as founders. I’m Asian, but as far as being a minority goes, being an Asian man is not the worst thing as a founder. I think because of other characteristics that I have, like having a PhD in machine learning from Stanford, I don’t not fit the mold that people are expecting. I think Asians are still pretty underrepresented in leadership roles.

I mentioned that although there are some very successful Asian founders, it seemed that Asian founders were especially lacking in terms of CEO representation. 

I share your impression that there aren’t many visible Asian CEOs. Jensen Huang, for example, has recently been in the media a lot. We’re still an early company, so I hope to help change that someday. However, it’s not always top of mind. Most days, I’m focused on what needs to get done at work.  

A fair answer, given that Neal is really in the thick of things having just launched Beacons 2.0 (a big expansion of their product suite featuring AI-powered tools) several months ago. 

SHOUTOUTS

The only thing Neal wanted to shoutout was Beacon’s mission:

For us, we always saw these creators as a new class of online entrepreneurs. They didn’t have a lot of tooling or support for them yet. That’s always been a big part of our mission at Beacons. This is actually related to the research I did at Stanford, where I got really excited about using software to create better economic opportunities for people around the world. I was doing that research on poverty in Africa. That’s a part of our mission at Beacons that I’m still pretty excited about, even though I never would have guessed that I would be working with TikTokers. It’s a cool space to be in. We’re starting to build one of the better, more comprehensive platforms out there to support online entrepreneurs, at least ones where content is pretty important for their business. We’re starting to build in a lot more AI and machine learning stuff to help them run their business more easily and make better decisions across the business. 

Given the rapid and accelerating growth of the creator economy, I suspect that Neal and his team will be in for some very busy and fun years. I’m excited to see how Neal grows during his time leading Beacons, and I hope that he’ll come back and grant us another interview once he’s made it!

Thank you Neal for speaking with us!

Awaken* newsletter

Navigating Startups and Challenges: A Conversation with Webflow’s Bryant Chou

On November 10th, I had the honor of chatting with Bryant Chou. Bryant is the co-founder of Webflow, one of the leading website-building platforms in the world with a valuation of $4 billion. Within startup-land, Webflow is especially notable for being mostly bootstrapped, waiting five years before raising an additional round after their seed round in 2014.

In our conversation, we touched on a variety of topics ranging from being Asian American to working at startups vs. big tech. 

Note: Quotes were lightly edited for brevity and clarity.

EARLY CAREER

I started our conversation by asking Bryant if he had any entrepreneurial endeavors before his first official company. While he never directly started a business, Bryant did display early signs of his scrappiness.

My mom gave me twenty dollars a week for all of my lunches and whatever discretionary income. So, of course I spent most of it on food, but that essentially meant that I had nothing really left over. But I also really wanted to be a normal high school student and go to prom and go to dances and stuff like that. So I made money in high school by entering Counter-Strike tournaments. I would earn, I don’t know, a few hundred bucks in these local LAN parties. And that’s how I paid for dances. So I always kind of adapted and tried to apply myself in different ways, with whatever skill sets I had.

He continued on to talk about his motivation for getting into startups:

To be honest, I don’t know if I would have done startups if I was at Facebook or Google. You know, I didn’t land those jobs coming out of school. I wasn’t smart enough. Didn’t pass those interviews… I think because I was at a mid-tier tech company, it kind of gave me more hunger to do something on my own. I wanted a change and believed software startups were the future. I took the plunge in 2011, driven by the belief that startups would be significant, 

However, he also cautioned about rushing into startups: 

You need to think about the things that really need to be true in order to be a founder and do it successfully. One of those things is working in a space that you really want to affect and make a difference in. You just want to make sure that you’re working on something that’s worthy of 16 hour days, you know?

BRYANT’S ROLE AT WEBFLOW

Although Bryant is perhaps best known as being the co-founder and CTO of Webflow, I saw that Bryant had recently shifted his focus away from technology to growth and marketing for Webflow, so I asked him about that:

Because we were bootstrapped, we never really invested in growth and marketing. So what started as an impatient maneuver on my end, like, ‘hey, I think we need to start doing these things’ turned into, ‘hey, this is actually something that is ROI positive.’ Who would have thunk? I suppose even though I’m an engineer and builder and product person at heart, I’m also a company builder in that sense. So I’ve–for example, started our marketing, started sales, started data, started security, so all these things are just things that are just like, ‘hey, we need to do these things. Let’s figure out how to do it.’ And I think that’s something that most entrepreneurs are going to have to do. I don’t think you’d necessarily have an option to not do it.

Coincidentally, I had talked to the new CTO of Webflow, Allan, a few months prior. Alan was super nice and very sharp–a great backfill for Bryant.

NAVIGATING ASIAN IDENTITY

As the Asian Hustle Network, I naturally had to ask Bryant about how he felt being Asian qualified his experience as a founder, he started out by acknowledging the position of Asian men:

It’s a well-known fact that Asian men in Western societies have a different bar to hurdle than other people. One of the reasons why I was so keen to help produce the 38 in the Garden movie with Jeremy Lin is because he articulated this so well. Have you seen that documentary? 

I had not, in fact, seen the documentary. Oops. I watched it after the interview on his recommendation and it was very, very good. Please give it a watch! Bryant continued:

It’s my one and only film and probably the last one that I’ll ever be involved in. I’m totally okay with this because I believe this cause is important. Part of the reason why I agreed to chat with you is because we obviously have a chip on our shoulder. We are seen differently in society. I’ve dealt with it in various ways myself. I’ve taken a colorblind approach to business interactions and never thought about my race or ethnicity in certain environments. I think that’s ultimately what you have to do. As Asian people in Western society, you’re supposed to be heads down, let your actions speak for themselves. I still very much have that approach. Who knows if it’s the most optimal thing to do.

Despite his colorblind approach, Bryant was clearly very cognizant of the fact that people perceive Asians differently, and had a suggestion for our readers:

To just walk amongst people of the same race and they speak your language, I think that’s like a worthy thing to do and to dive into. I identify as Taiwanese, at least as much as I identify as an American. When I go there, I literally feel different. I feel like I’m one of the same, like I’m among my people, I’m not viewed as a minority, I’m just viewed as a normal person. I think every Asian-American should have that sensation at some point in their life that they feel like they’re seen as someone just like everyone else, and the only place where I felt that has been Taiwan.

I knew Bryant grew up in the Bay where there were a lot of Asians, so I asked him if he felt the same sensation in those areas, he suggested:

The broader construct of society that we live in is still the US, which is still 85% non-Asian. I think Asian Americans make up about 12% of the population, maybe even less. I don’t think it’s so much about not being in the majority. It’s more about the sensation that you get that you are biologically or ethnically more similar to the people that you’re walking around with in Asia.

NAVIGATING ENTREPRENEURIAL CHALLENGES

Moving onto the next topic, I asked Bryant about his emotional experience as I had heard a lot of founders talk about how difficult this aspect of running a startup was:

I thought it would be harder technically than it would be emotionally. But I would say the social emotional components of building a company are 100 times harder than the technology itself.

I followed up by asking if there were any specific experiences that stood out to him:

They’ll come up in different forms. In 2020, there were a lot of social justice issues that made running a company very challenging. Ultimately, when you’re at a company, you need to be hyper-rational. You’re faced with a conundrum between being a good steward of the company’s mission and vision and maybe what people inside your company believe, and sometimes those things clash.

It was clear that this level of situation took an emotional toll on Bryant, so I asked him how he copes with it and prevents it from seeping into his personal life:

You compartmentalize most of it. It helps to have a supporting spouse and partner. It’s great to have kids that can distract you from this.

ADVICE FOR YOUNG PROFESSIONALS

Adding on his comments about entrepreneurial pain, Bryant offered:

I think like if you’re in your 20s, I would actually be chasing that kind of pain. It’s the best time to chase pain and suffering. If it means that will lead to a certain level of intellectual expansion, social emotional awareness. There’s no better time to find the limits of what you’re capable of than when you’ve graduated, when you’ve got a whole life in front of you. Like, it’s time to see what you’re made of. So I’d be a huge proponent of young folks going to startups that are hectic and crazy, working in environments where they can learn, dedicating time and energy to perfecting a craft. Those are things that you don’t learn in school. And those are only things that you can chase on your own accord.

This made me think about how I have a lot of friends who go into Big Tech. A good number of them say that they want to pursue their own company eventually, but want to get their start at a big company to build up their skills. I asked Bryant what he thought about this approach:

There’s two kinds of learning that you can do at a big tech company. One is technology related. So you can go and immerse yourself in a technology, and be surrounded by technologists that can help you. That’s something very valuable for sure, but learning how to do things the way Meta or Google does things is not transferable at all to startups. None of their processes matter. None of their ways of thinking about building products matter. It’s just a whole ‘nother ball game. There are maybe some professional skills that you get to pick up. Communication, the ergonomics around the work–such as just documenting your work, making your work transparent, and just picking up good habits–that’s for sure. But there’s nothing like working in an early stage startup where you’re building something from nothing. You know, you’re almost never doing that at a big company.

I was somewhat surprised that Bryant felt that the Meta or Google way of thinking about products was applicable, so I pressed him to elaborate:

So actually, that’s a great example of something that I did retain. It’s more so the principles at which you approach building a product, right? Developing customer empathy, ensuring you’re not over-engineering things really matters. Facebook and Meta have an abundance of resources. Engineers at large companies are very good at building incredible things that are well-defined in a narrow spectrum. However, in a startup, you’re trying to go as wide as possible with what an engineer could potentially contribute to and build 60 to 80% of it. It doesn’t need to be perfect.

Bryant’s comment about over-resourced companies made me think about the opposite, under-resourced companies, and how I often hear about employees at those companies working weekends and long nights. I asked Bryant if he thought that was necessary in a startup:

There’s a time and place for it. I don’t believe nights and weekends are required. It’s important for people in their 20s to find their limits professionally and personally. This means making time for personal things like dating, hanging out with friends, and attending events. It’s about striking the right balance. For instance, I encourage my team members to take vacations when needed. It’s crucial for startup leaders to have a good pulse on their employees, understanding their strengths and weaknesses, and checking in on their well-being. I don’t believe anyone at SpaceX or elsewhere can stare at a problem for 100 hours a week and feel productive. It’s important to step out of your zone, draw inspiration from different things, and take breaks. To live a balanced life. When I say that people should find their limits professionally and personally, it’s like that limit is different for each person. But you have to feel like you’re able to stretch, build the muscle for your mental and physical strength to stretch when you need it. I think that’s really important to do.

SHOUTOUTS  

Webflow is hiring across multiple functions! Please visit this link to find and apply for open roles, or feel free to get in touch with Bryant at bryant@webflow.com if you would like to reach out personally for opportunities.

38 at the Garden, the short film about Jeremey Lin which Bryant helped produce is available to watch on HBO Max. The film is 38 minutes short and is a must-watch for all Asian Americans.

Thank you Bryant for speaking with us!

1acf417a7f79dcca12c8fadaae682231-jpg

News

Ethos Fund’s Inaugural $12 Million Fund Invests In US-Vietnam Tech Synergy

Ethos Fund, the joint creation of David Yo and Simon Shin, serves a unique purpose of forging connections between the tech ecosystems of Vietnam and the U.S. Their approach is both innovative and influential, laying the foundation for strengthened cross-border collaboration between two nations. 

This innovative firm moves away from conventional models by prioritizing investments in a distinct group: “third culture founders”. Shaped by navigating multiple cultures, these individuals possess a unique blend of global understanding and a fervent desire to solve critical problems.

Ethos Fund acts as a bridge, fostering collaboration between the growing tech ecosystems of the United States and Vietnam. Led by the Korean-American duo of David Yi and Simon Shin, the firm leverages their founders’ multicultural backgrounds to identify promising investment opportunities. Their inaugural $12 million fund targets both sides of the US-Vietnam tech equation.

David Yi (L) and Simon Shin (R), co-founders of Ethos Fund (Ethos Fund)

The name “Ethos” reflects their core philosophy. Ethos Fund believes that founders are more than just cross-cultural connectors. Their unique third culture, shaped by experiences beyond nationality or geography, drives their vision and impact.

In the US, Ethos Fund seeks out “third culture founders”, individuals whose experiences span across cultures. Ethos Fund identifies these innovative minds with the potential to innovate industries and empower them through investments.

Within Vietnam, Ethos Fund takes a bold step further. They actively invest in early-stage startups, even those pre-revenue and pre-product. Their focus lies on the Vietnamese diaspora and expats filled with innovative ideas.

Ethos Fund’s commitment extends beyond financial support. They actively cultivate a collaborative environment by offering educational programs and events specifically designed to connect US and Vietnamese entrepreneurs. This dedication to enhancing cross-national collaboration emphasizes Ethos Fund’s vision for a future where geographical boundaries are no longer a concern.